Why is portraiture important to members of aristocracy? Particularly in 19th century british society?
July 142010
For more than one reason.
Firstly, portraits are like family photographs. They are a record of past times, and were kept and looked at in much the same way. If you visited a geat house, you would not be shown a photograph album – you would be walked through a gallery to admire great-great uncle Cuthbert in his admiral’s uniform. Of course paintings on that scale are expensive both to commission and to house, which restricted portraiture to those with sufficient wealth.
Secondly (and again like some family albums) they were a way of marking status. Where a modern album might have a photo of Grandad on his yacht, showing what a rich man he was, a 19thC oil painting might have him posed in front of a racehorse, his house or his garden, or holding some emblem of his trade or profession – an engineer or shipwright with a ruler, a writer with a pen, a bishop with a bible and wearing his canonicals.
Hope this helps.
2nd draft Slide show of my photos taken from portraiture photography class, as attending student. Edited to give a different feel & pace compared to slide show class 01. Uploaded purely as technology and media experiment.
Highlights clip of a Wet Paint Studio Group art demo video recorded by John Aalto. WPSG rents the full version recordings to members at the monthly Business Meeting (Gillette House, Sayville, NY).
SwissPortraiture.com – See a wonderful world of pictorial adventure throughout Switzerland brought to you by Roland Walliser
In this episode of Inspiring Minds I interview celebrity photographer Michael Grecco. Presented by http://www.samys.com This helpful video will shed some light on how one gets to be involved in photographing the rich and famous. Enjoy